More
than a Number: Why Class Size Matters
NCTE
Position on Class Size and Teacher Workload, Kindergarten to College
Download PDF or Word file
The
Standards for the English Language Arts describe and clarify what students
should learn in English Studies and Language Arts—reading, writing, speaking,
listening, viewing, and visually representing—to be literate in today's world.
This expanded definition of literacy occurs at a time when classrooms are more
culturally diverse than ever, when technology and cyberspace bid for schools' attention
and dollars, and when employers are calling for more and more highly skilled
workers. The challenges of incorporating these necessarily high standards for
the future require citizens and the educational community to reconsider the
number of students assigned to teachers of English language arts.
What
Our Students Need to Succeed
NCTE
believes that all students have the right to:
* ample opportunities to
engage in writing activities;
* frequent opportunities
for meaningful oral interaction in the classroom;
* frequent, timely,
substantive feedback and assessment of their written and oral work;
* multiple authentic
assessments;
* effective interaction
with peers regarding both oral and written work;
* frequent experiences
with various print and non-print technologies;
* ample time for
developing critical and reflective thinking;
* a fair share of the
teacher's time.
NCTE
also believes that students have a right to teachers who:
* develop individual
instructional relationships with their students;
* provide frequent,
substantive feedback to students' work;
* devise creative
curricula which honor individual learning styles;
* guide students in their
critical evaluation and use of various technologies, print, and non-print
media;
* engage regularly in
professional development;
* communicate regularly
with students and parents.
Student
Rights and Needs
No
football coach in his right mind would try to teach 150 players one hour per
day and hope to win the game on Friday night. No, the team is limited to 40 or
50 highly motivated players, and the coach has three or four assistants to work
on the many skills needed to play the game. The Ôstudent-teacher' ratio is
maybe 15:1. But the English teacher—all alone—has 150 Ôplayers' of the game of composition
(not to mention literature, language, and the teaching of other matters dropped
into the English curriculum by unthinking enthusiasts).
—John
C. Maxwell
All
students have the right to engage in a variety of literacy activities, to have
meaningful interaction with peers and teachers, and to receive frequent and
timely feedback. Students also have a right to teachers who develop creative
curricula. Students need teachers who have the time and skills necessary to
honor individual learning styles and accommodate individual student's
instructional needs; who guide students in their critical evaluation and use of
various technologies; who engage regularly in professional development; and who
communicate regularly with students and parents. These student rights must be
the foremost consideration when making decisions concerning class size and
teacher workload (see Breaking Ranks).
Facts
* Reduced class size
provides students with many benefits: greater opportunities for participation,
greater individual attention, and improved instruction. Conflicting
interpretations and the implications for policy decisions at the local, state,
and national levels make research on class size and teacher workload
controversial. Yet, a current analysis of long-term studies and recent
grassroots research reveals that class size does indeed have a major impact on
student achievement, behavior, and attention (see Bracey,
"Research").
* Student achievement
increases significantly in classes of fewer than 20. Smaller classes,
complemented by diverse teaching methods, create better student performance,
more positive attitudes, and fewer discipline problems. Students and parents
have the right to expect classrooms with these characteristics. (See Class
Size Reduction in Freshman English Classes.)
Challenges
Teaching
workload includes, but is often not limited to, the amount of time spent
working, the number of classes taught, and the number of students in each
class. Additionally, English teachers spend only about three-quarters of their
average work week at school (see Dusel). This average does not reflect the
amount of time necessary to adequately address the needs of students. Teachers
of English language arts consistently find themselves working outside of
school, thus lengthening their work week. This means that teachers of English,
on average, work longer hours than their colleagues in other disciplines. A
teacher with 125 students who spends only 20 minutes per paper must have at
least 2,500 minutes, or a total of nearly 42 hours, to respond to all the
students' papers. Therefore, responding to one paper per week for each of their
125 students requires English teachers to work over 80 hours a week. This
response and evaluation time must also be balanced with time for in-class
instruction, planning and preparation, administrative paperwork and functions,
as well as school supervisory and advisory responsibilities. No other nation
requires teachers to work a greater number of hours a day and year than the
United States. Compared to their counterparts in other industrialized nations,
U.S. teachers lack adequate time for class preparation and collaborative work
with their colleagues.
Goals
and Strategies
To
reduce teacher workload and increase the quality of literacy education at the
elementary, secondary, and college levels, the NCTE recommends a three-pronged
approach: reduce the class size and workload; hire qualified professional
teachers; and provide strong professional development. Such an approach will
transform English language arts.
Yet,
no simple solutions to the complex challenges of increased literacy demands for
our students exist. Funding limitations, school space, the available pool of
qualified teachers, and increased attention to technology force community and
school leaders to make difficult decisions about changes in class size and
workload. To address these concerns, the NCTE recommends the following planning
strategies:
* Form a planning team of
teaching faculty, principals or deans, central office or college
administrators, a School Board or governing board member.
* Develop a short- and
long-range plan of action, including goals, timeline, rationale, impact on
personnel and budget.
* Determine such needed
resources as personnel, classroom space, building space, along with the
budgetary implications.
* Develop a staff
development plan for experienced and new teachers.
* Encourage school-based
decisions on such issues as space, teachers, and budget.
Whatever
the strategies employed, reducing class size and teacher workload significantly
increases the quality of literacy education in our schools.
The
first curriculum priority is language. Our use of complex symbols separates
human beings from all other forms of life. Language provides the connecting
tissue that binds society together, allowing us to express feelings and ideas,
and powerfully influence the attitudes of others. It is the most essential tool
for learning. Language . . . is the means by which all other subjects are
pursued.
—Ernest
L. Boyer
Statement
on Class Size and Teacher Workload: Elementary
Revised
by the NCTE Elementary Section, 1996
1. The elementary classroom
teacher should not be responsible for more than 25 pupils per class, and in
grades KÐ1 no more than 20 pupils per class.
2. One class period or a
minimum of 30 minutes should be provided within each school day for each
elementary school teacher's planning time.
3. A half day a month
should be set aside for each elementary school teacher for long-range planning.
4. Participation in
continuous professional development programs should be considered a part of
teachers' workloads and should involve a minimum of three days released time.
5. Participation in
professional meetings and activities at local, state, and national levels
should be encouraged and financially supported.
6. The use of additional
human resources in the classroom should not justify increased pupilÐteacher
ratio.
7. A library media center
with proper staff and adequate, varied resources should be provided in every
elementary school. It is recommended that each media center have a minimum of
25 books per student and that individual classrooms contain adequate resource
materials and book collections.
8. Clerical services should
be available to teachers on an assigned basis to attend to non-instructional
tasks such as the collection of money for special events, attendance records,
fund raising, and recess and lunch duty. A teacher's primary responsibility
should be instruction.
9. Computers, modems, and a
phone line should be available in each classroom.
High
schools exist to develop students' powers of thought, taste, and judgment . . .
to help them with these uses of their minds. Such undertakings cannot be
factory-wrought, for young people grow in idiosyncratic, variable ways, often
unpredictably.
—Theodore
R. Sizer
Statement on Class Size and Teacher Workload:
Secondary
Prepared
by the NCTE Secondary Section, 1990
The
Secondary Section of the National Council of Teachers of English recommends
that schools, districts, and states adopt plans and implement activities
resulting in class sizes of not more than 20 and a workload of not more than 80
for English language arts teachers by the year 2000.
Effective
learning demands opportunities for students to become actively involved in
their education, and demands many roles for their teachers: teacher as
facilitator, as enabler, as empowerer—not only as lecturer and transmitter of
knowledge. These opportunities and roles cannot be achieved when teachers are
faced with large classes and heavy workloads.
* A teacher who faces 25 students in a
class period of 50 minutes has no more than 2 minutes, at best, per pupil for
one-to-one interaction during any period.
* The greater the number of students in
class, the fewer the opportunities for students to participate orally.
* The larger the number of students in a
class, the greater the amount of time devoted to classroom management rather
than instruction.
* The larger the class size, the less likely
teachers are to develop lessons encouraging higher-level thinking.
* Teachers of larger classes are more
likely to spend less time with each student's paper, and to concentrate on
mechanics rather than on style and content.
Policy
makers must realize that when a teacher spends 20 minutes reading, analyzing,
and responding to each paper for a class of 25 students, the teacher must have
500 minutes for those processes alone. A teacher with 125 students who spends
only 20 minutes per paper must have at least 2,500 minutes, or a total of
nearly 42 hours, to respond to each assignment. Therefore, responding to one
paper per week for each of their 125 students requires English teachers to work
over 80 hours a week.
Simply
reducing class size alone does not necessarily result in improved achievement
when instructional methods do not change. Therefore, attention to staff
development while addressing class-size reduction goals will assure maximum
benefits for students.
Researchers
have identified the following encouraging results from reducing class size and
improving instructional methods:
* Smaller classes result
in increased teacherÐstudent contact.
* Students in smaller
classes show more appreciation for one another and more desire to participate
in classroom activities.
* In smaller classes, more
learning activities take place.
* Smaller classes foster
greater interaction among students, helping them understand one another and
increasing their desire to assist one another.
* Smaller classes allow
for potential disciplinary problems to be identified and resolved more quickly.
* Smaller classes result
in higher teacher morale and reduced stress.
* Fewer retentions, fewer
referrals to special education, and fewer dropouts are the ultimate rewards of
class-size reduction.
The
Secondary Section recommends the following five-year plan:
1. Establish a goal to
reduce each English language arts class to not more than 20 students and to
limit each language arts teacher's workload to not more than 80 students.
Districts may demonstrate progress toward this goal in a variety of ways.
2. Write a plan for ongoing
staff development to assist teachers as they modify instructional techniques to
take advantage of reduced class size. These efforts may include such experiences
as conference attendance, inservice courses, college courses, teacher support
groups, and writing projects.
3. Collect evidence of
support for teacher examination, development, and implementation of effective
classroom practices that increase the frequency and quality of teacherÐstudent
interactions intended to improve students' language competency.
4. Develop a timeline with
annual goals and report on annual accomplishments.
5. Seek a statement of
support for the plan from the local board of education and the administrators
and teachers involved.
To
teach content in a way that will make subject matter appropriated by students
implies the creation and exercise of serious intellectual discipline... To
believe that placing students in a learning milieu automatically creates a
situation for critical knowing without this kind of discipline is a vain hope.
Just as it is impossible to teach someone how to learn without teaching some
content, it is also impossible to teach intellectual discipline except through
a practice of knowing that enables learners to become active and critical
subjects, constantly increasing their critical abilities.
—Paulo
Freire
Statement
on Class Size and Teacher Workload: College
Prepared
by the NCTE College Section, 1987
In
an era of increasing public concern over the writing and reading ability of
college students, it is especially important that the workload of English
faculty members be reasonable enough to guarantee that every student receive
the time and attention needed for genuine improvement. Faculty members must be
given adequate time to fulfill their responsibility to their students, their
departments, their institutions, their profession, the larger community, and to
themselves. Without that time, they cannot teach effectively. Unless English
teachers are given reasonable loads, students cannot make the progress the
public demands.
Economic
pressures and budgetary restrictions may tempt administrations to increase
teaching loads. With this conflict in mind, the College Section of the National
Council of Teachers of English endorses the following standards:
1. English
faculty members should never be assigned more than 12 hours a week of classroom
teaching.
In fact, the teaching load should be less, to provide adequate time for reading
and responding to students' writing; for holding individual conferences; for
preparing to teach classes; and for research and professional growth.
2. No more
than 20 students should be permitted in any writing class. Ideally, classes should
be limited to 15. Students cannot learn to write without writing. In sections
larger than 20, teachers cannot possibly give student writing the immediate and
individual response necessary for growth and improvement.
3. Remedial
or developmental sections should be limited to a maximum of 15 students. It is essential to
provide these students extra teaching if they are to acquire the reading and
writing skills they need in college.
4. No English
faculty member should teach more than 60 writing students a term: if the
students are developmental, the maximum should be 45.
5. No more
than 25 students should be permitted in discussion courses in literature or
language. Classes larger than 25 do not give students and teachers the opportunity
to engage literary texts through questions, discussion, and writing. If lecture
classes must be offered, teachers should be given adjusted time or assistance
to hold conferences and respond to students' writing.
6. Any
faculty members assigned to reading or writing laboratories or to skills
centers should have that assignment counted as part of the teaching load. Identifying and
addressing the individual needs of students is a demanding form of teaching.
7. No
full-time faculty member's load should be composed exclusively of sections of a
single course. (An exception might occur when a specific teacher, for
professional reasons such as research or intensive experimentation,
specifically requests such an assignment.) Even in colleges where the English
program consists mainly of composition, course assignments should be varied.
Repeating identical material for the third or fourth time the same day or
semester after semester is unlikely to be either creative or responsive.
8. No English
faculty member should be required to prepare more than three different courses
during a single term. Even if the faculty member has taught the same course in
previous years, the material must be reexamined in the context of current
scholarship, and the presentation adapted to the needs of each class.
9. The time
and responsibility required for administrative, professional, scholarly, and
institutional activities should be considered in determining teaching loads and
schedules for English faculty members. These responsibilities cover a broad range, such
as directing independent study, theses, and dissertations; advising students on
academic programs; supervising student publications; developing new courses and
materials; serving on college or departmental committees; publishing scholarly
and creative work; refereeing and editing professional manuscripts and
journals; or holding office in professional organizations.
Selected
Bibliography
Bartholomae, David, and
Anthony Petrosky. (1986). Facts, Counterfacts and Artifacts: Theory and
Method for a Reading and Writing Course. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton Cook.
Bloom, Lynn Z., Donald
A. Daiker, and Edward M. White, eds. (1996). Composition in the Twenty-First
Century: Crisis and Change. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.
Bracey, Gerald W.
(September 1995). "Research Oozes into Practice: The Case of Class
Size." Phi Delta Kappan, 89Ð90.
Bracey, G. W., and M. A.
Resnick. (1998). Raising the Bar: A School Board Primer on Student
Achievement. Alexandria, VA: National School Board Association.
Breaking Ranks:
Changing an American Institution. (1996). Reston, VA: National Association of
Secondary School Principals.
Class Size Reduction
in Freshman English Classes. (1992). San Mateo, CA: Office of the Director of
Curriculum, San Mateo Union High School District.
The Condition of
Education, 1996. "Teachers' Working Conditions." (NCES 97Ð371).
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Dusel, William J. (1955,
October). "Determining an Efficient Teaching Load in English." Illinois
English Bulletin, 1Ð19.
Feldman, S. (1998, March
11). "Think Small." Education Week.
Hawisher, Gail E., and
Cynthia L. Selfe, eds. (1996). CCCC Bibliography of Composition and
Rhetoric, 1994 ed. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Jones, R. (1998).
"What Works: Researchers Tell What Schools Must Do to Improve Student
Achievement." The American School Board Journal, 28Ð33.
Myers, Miles. (1996). Changing
Our Minds: Negotiating English and Literacy. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers
of English.
National Council of
Teachers of English. (April/May 1997). Council-Grams: News and Information
for Leaders of the Council (Vol. LX, No. 2). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers
of English.
Newkirk, Thomas. (1998).
Nuts and Bolts: A Practical Guide to Teaching College Composition. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton
Cook.
Rankin, Elizabeth.
(1994). Seeing Yourself as a Teacher: Conversations with Five New Teachers
in a University Writing Program. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of
English.
Rose, Mike. (1995). Possible
Lives: The Promise of Public Education. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Shanahan, Timothy, ed.
(1994). Teachers Thinking, Teachers Knowing: Reflections on Literacy and
Language.
Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Standards for the
English Language Arts. (1996). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Toch, T., and Streisand,
B. (1997, October 13). "Does Class Size Matter?" U.S. News &
World Report, 22Ð29.
Wenglinsky, H. (1998). The
Effects of Class Size on Achievement: What the Research Says. A Policy
Information Memorandum. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This position
statement may be printed, copied, and disseminated
without
permission from NCTE.