$ CHAPTER 4 $
SELL THE LEXUS, BURN THE OLIVE TREE: Globalization and Its Discontents
(Download printer friendly version)
I was getting myself measured for a straitjacket when I received an urgent message
from Bolivia.
The jacket was Thomas Friedman's idea. He's the New York Times columnist and
amateur economist who wrote The Lexus and the Olive Tree, which is kind of a
long, deep kiss to globalization. I was in Cleveland to debate Friedman at the
Council on World Affairs meeting in May 2001. Globalization, he told the council,
is all about the communications revolution. It's about the Internet. It's about
how you can sit in your bedroom, buy shares in amazon.com and send e-mails to
Eskimos all at the same time, wearing your pajamas.
According to Friedman, we are "connected" and "empowered"
and "enabled." And if that isn't cool enough by itself, globalization
makes economies grow. Any nation on the planet that takes the pledge and follows
the map can open the hidden gold mine. Poverty will end, as will the tyrannies
of government. And every Bolivian will get their own e-mail address.
The end of world poverty! Eskimos! E-mail! I wanted this brave new future and
I wanted it now! All I had to do, said Friedman, is change into something a
little more form-fitting. "The Golden Straitjacket is the defining political
economic garment of globalization," Friedman says. And, he explains, the
tighter you wear it, "the more gold it produces."
Friedman is talking—figuratively, of course—about the latest economic
fashion, "tailored by Margaret Thatcher." Ronald Reagan, he adds,
"sewed on the buttons." There are about a dozen specific steps, but
the key ones are: cut government, cut the budgets and bureaucracies and the
rules they make; privatize just about everything; deregulate currency and capital
markets, free the banks to speculate in currency and shift capital across borders.
But don't stop there. Open every nation's industry to foreign trade, eliminate
those stodgy old tariffs and welcome foreign ownership without limit; wipe away
national border barriers to commerce; let the market set prices on everything
from electricity to water; and let the arbitrageurs direct our investments.
Then haul those old government bureaucracies to the guillotine: cut public pensions,
cut welfare, cut subsidies; let politics shrink and let the marketplace guide
us.
Selling these rules is easy work, he said and grinned, as there is no dissent.
Yes, there were tree-hugging troublemakers demonstrating in Seattle. But as
Britain's prime minister Tony Blair said, "People who indulge in the protests
are completely misguided. World trade is good for people's jobs and people's
living standards. These protests are a complete outrage."
But let's forgive youth its lack of sophistication. What the kids in the street
didn't know is that history's over with, done, kaput! Friedman tells us: "The
historical debate is over. The answer is free-market capitalism." And whether
Republicans or Democrats, Tories or New Labour, Socialists or Christian Democrats,
we're all signed on, we're all laced up in our straitjackets, merely quibbling
about the sleeve length.
I was about to say, "Strap me in." But then I received this note—an
e-mail—from Cochabamba, Bolivia. It was about Oscar Olivera, a community
leader I knew through my work with Latin American labor unions. It said: Close
to 1,000 heavily armed members of the Bolivian security forces dispersed peaceful
marchers with tear gas, beating them and confiscating their personal possessions.
What was the problem? Maybe the Internet was down and the Bolivians were protesting
that they couldn't unload their Amazon.com shares.
The message ended: "Oscar is missing. His whereabouts are unknown?”
Didn't Oscar know that he was "connected and enabled"?
This reminded me that a large cache of documents had recently fallen into my
hands. They came from the deepest files of the World Bank and International
Monetary Fund, from the desk drawers of officials at the European Commission
and the World Trade Organization: Country Assistance Strategies, an Article
133 diplomatic letter, memos from the secretariats—the real stuff of globalization—from
inside the organizations that dream up, then dictate, the terms of the new international
economics.
There was nothing here about Eskimos on cell phones, but I did find an awful
lot about cutting Argentine pensions by 13 percent, breaking up unions in Brazil
. . . and raising water prices in Bolivia, all laid out in chilling techno-speak
and stamped "for official use only."
The spiky-haired protesters in the streets of Seattle believe there's some kind
of grand conspiracy between the corporate powers, the IMF, the World Bank and
an alphabet soup of agencies that work to suck the blood of Bolivians and steal
gold from Tanzania. But the tree huggers are wrong; the details are far more
stomach-churning than they even imagine. In March 2001, when Ecuador's government
raised the price of cooking gas and hungry Indians burned the capital, I was
reading the World Bank's confidential plan issued months before. The bank, with
the IMF, had directed this 80 percent increase in the price of domestic fuel,
knowing this could set the nation ablaze. It's as if the riots were scheduled
right into the plan.
And they were. That's according to one of the only inside sources I can name—Joseph
Stiglitz, former chief economist of the World Bank. "We called them the
IMF riots." The riots as well as the response were programmed, the latter
referred to euphemistically as "resolve"—the police, the tanks,
the crackdown.
I threw off my straitjacket and began to write. And that's what you'll find
in this chapter: my reports explicating lists of "conditionalities"
(167 for Ecuador) required by the World Bank and IMF for their loans; unpublished
proposed terms for implementing article VI.4 of the GATS treaty under the World
Trade Organization; intellectual property rules under something called the "TRIPS"
agreement, which determines everything from breast cancer treatment to Dr. Dre's
control of rap music: all the dirty little facts of globalization as it is actually
practiced. And you can read it in your pajamas.
You'll also find out why Oscar was missing; he was seized, in fact, by Bolivia's
own globalization enforcement army.
Friedman ended his talk—it turns out he won't debate face-to-face, so
we had to speak on separate days—by quoting with joyous approval the wisdom
of Andy Grove, the chairman of Intel Corporation: "The purpose of the new
capitalism is to shoot the wounded."
That day, for Oscar's sake, I was hoping Friedman was wrong.
Chapter 4 from The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, by Greg Palast (PLUME
press, 2004)